Retrogression In Golf: Mastering The Art Of Self-Correction

Retrogression is a tie-breaking method used in golf, primarily in Canada, to determine the winner when two players have completed their rounds with the same score. It involves examining the players' scores on previous holes to see if either player had a lead at any point. For example, if two players are tied after 18 holes, retrogression looks at their scores after 17 holes to see if either player had an advantage. If one player had a better score after 17 holes, they are awarded the win. If the players were tied after 17 holes, retrogression continues to look at earlier holes until a difference in scores is found. This method has been a topic of debate among golfers, with some considering it confusing and unfair, especially when compared to other tie-breaking procedures, such as playoffs or considering the best score on the last nine holes.

Explore related products

A Girl's On-course Survival Guide to Golf: Solid Golf Fundamentals... From Tee to Green and In-Between

$40.98

Golf My Way: The Instructional Classic, Revised and Updated

$13.68 $25

Retrogression

$12.5 $12.5

Technological Retrogression: A Schumpeterian Interpretation of Modernization in Reverse (Anthem Other Canon Economics)

$40 $125

Chinese Politics in the Era of Xi Jinping: Renaissance, Reform, or Retrogression?

$49.87 $74.99

Retrogression as a tie-breaker

Retrogression is a method of tie-breaking in golf when two players complete their rounds with the same score. It is primarily used in Canada, with Europe favouring a different approach.

The process of retrogression involves examining the scores of the players after 17 holes to see if either had a lead over the other. If Player A had a lead over Player B after 17 holes, Player A wins, and Player B takes second place. If the players are tied after 17 holes, the scores after 16 holes are then considered, and so on, until a winner is determined.

Retrogression can be applied to gross or net scores. However, some golfers find it frustrating, arguing that it does not determine the better player, as the winner is not necessarily the player with the better overall score. They also argue that a tie-breaker after 17 holes does not make sense, as the match is not over, and a playoff or 'shootout' would be preferable.

The USGA recommends settling ties with a playoff of at least three holes, and if the competition is still tied, a hole-by-hole (sudden death) playoff may be used. If a playoff is not feasible, matching scorecards is recommended, with the winner determined by the best score for the last nine holes. If scores are still tied, the last six holes, last three holes, and finally, the 18th hole are considered.

Retrogression rules

Retrogression is a method of tie-breaking in golf when two players have completed their rounds with the same score. It is used primarily in Canada and can be applied to gross or net scores.

Step 1: Identify the Tied Players

The first step is to identify the players who have completed their rounds with the same total score. Let's call them Player A and Player B.

Step 2: Examine Previous Hole Scores

If both players are tied after 18 holes, retrogression examines their scores on the previous hole (hole 17) to see if either player had a lead.

Step 3: Determine the Leader after Each Hole

If Player A had a better score on hole 17, Player A is awarded the higher place. If Player B had a better score on hole 17, Player B is awarded the higher place. If both players were tied on hole 17, move on to the next step.

Step 4: Continue Retrogression if Necessary

If the players were tied on hole 17, examine their scores on hole 16. Compare their scores to determine who had the lead after that hole. Continue this process, moving back hole by hole, until a leader can be determined.

For example, if Player A and Player B are tied after 18 holes, and both players were also tied after 17 holes, the retrogression rule would examine their scores on hole 16. If Player A had a better score on hole 16, Player A would be awarded the higher place. If they were still tied on hole 16, the process would continue to hole 15 and so on until a leader is established.

Retrogression is a controversial rule in golf, with some players arguing that it does not determine the better player, especially if the tie is broken based on earlier holes. It is important to note that retrogression is just one method of tie-breaking, and other procedures, such as countback, may also be used depending on the competition's rules.

Retrogression vs playoffs

Retrogression and playoffs are both methods of breaking ties in golf. While retrogression is used primarily in Canada, playoffs are a more widely adopted method, with all regular PGA Tour and European Tour tournaments using this system, except for The Players Championship.

Retrogression

Retrogression is a method of tie-breaking used when two players complete their rounds with the same score. In this case, the scores of the players are examined from earlier holes to see if either player had a lead with respect to the other. For example, if Sam and Robert are tied for third place after 18 holes, retrogression looks at their scores after 17 holes. If Robert had the lead over Sam after 17 holes, he wins third place, and Sam is awarded fourth place. If both players were tied after 17 holes, then regression looks at their scores after 16 holes, and so on. Retrogression can be applied to gross or net scores.

Playoffs

Playoffs are an alternative method of breaking ties in golf. There are several formats of playoffs, including:

• Sudden death: This is the most common playoff format, especially in stroke play and match play tournaments. The tied participants play one extra hole at a time, with those still tied for the lowest score moving on to the next hole until a winner is determined.
• Aggregate playoff: This is the oldest playoff format in stroke play tournaments, where the winner is determined by the lowest cumulative score in a series of holes, most commonly three, four, or eighteen holes. This format is considered fairer than sudden death as it gives players more opportunities to recover from a bad shot.
• Full 18-hole playoff: This format is held on the day after the tournament. If there is still a tie after the full 18 holes, then sudden death is played.

Retrogression vs. Playoffs

Both retrogression and playoffs have their advantages and disadvantages. Retrogression is a quick way to break ties without the need for additional holes to be played, which can be advantageous in terms of time and resource constraints. However, some golfers argue that it does not determine the better player, as it does not take into account the full round of golf. Playoffs, on the other hand, allow for more holes to be played, giving players the opportunity to showcase their skills over a longer period. However, playoffs can extend the duration of a tournament, potentially causing logistical issues. Ultimately, both methods serve the same purpose of tie-breaking, with the choice of method depending on the specific context, preferences, and rules of the tournament.

Retrogression in Canada vs Europe

Retrogression is a tie-breaking method used in golf when two players complete their rounds with the same score. It is primarily used in Canada, where Golf Canada is the governing body of the sport. In cases of tied scores, retrogression examines the players' scores after 17 holes to see if either player had a lead over the other. If one player had the lead after 17 holes, they are awarded the higher place. If the players were tied after 17 holes, retrogression looks at their scores after 16 holes, and so on, until the tie is broken. This method has been criticised by some golfers, who argue that it does not determine the better player and that a playoff or tie-breaker on the final hole would be more appropriate.

In Europe, the convention for breaking ties is almost the opposite of retrogression. The winner is determined by the player with the best back nine, or if tied, the best back six, back three, and finally, the last hole. This method rewards the player who finishes stronger. Some golfers in Europe have also expressed confusion over the application of retrogression and have questioned the consistency of its use in tournaments.

While retrogression is commonly used in Canada, there are variations in its application. For example, the OVGA uses a combination of retrogression and the best back nine method to break ties. This has caused some controversy, as golfers have questioned the fairness of this approach.

The Rules of Golf, which are published and distributed by Golf Canada, are updated every four years in collaboration with the R&A and the United States Golf Association. These rules include acceptable tie-breaking procedures, and it is important for competition organisers to follow these guidelines when determining placements in tournaments.

Retrogression and scorecards

Retrogression is a method of tie-breaking in golf when two players complete their rounds with the same score. It is primarily used in Canada, with other areas, such as Europe, favouring a playoff or 'shootout' to determine the winner.

Retrogression works by examining the players' scores after a certain number of holes to see if either player had a lead over the other at that point in the game. For example, if two players are tied for third place after 18 holes, retrogression looks at their scores after 17 holes to see if either player was in the lead at that point. If one player had the lead after 17 holes, they are awarded third place, and the other player is awarded fourth place. If the players were tied after 17 holes, retrogression looks at their scores after 16 holes, and so on.

Retrogression can be applied to gross or net scores. However, some golfers find it frustrating, particularly if they had a bad start to the game but improved towards the end. In this situation, retrogression would not recognise their improvement, and they would lose out to a player who started well but performed worse towards the end of the game.

If a playoff is not feasible, matching scorecards can be used as an alternative tie-breaking method. This involves determining the winner based on the best score for the last nine holes. If the players have the same score for the last nine, the winner is determined based on the last six holes, then the last three, and finally, the 18th hole. This method should be announced in advance, along with what will happen if it does not produce a winner.

Frequently asked questions